Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4100M
1.627 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 +337%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
36
-
Compute Units
-
1152
Shading Units
2304
96
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
67.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
1.627 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
67.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU104
N15E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
160W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy