Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4100M
1.627 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +863%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
1152
Shading Units
5120
96
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
67.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
1.627 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
67.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GV100
N15E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy