Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 168% (2100MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
18112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +7655%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
19456
112
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
750W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
MI300
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
146 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy