Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla P6

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla P6

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 16GB VRAM Tesla P6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla P6 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (1506MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Tesla P6 +192%
6.169 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K4200
32
Tesla P6 +196%
95
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2017
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
1012 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1506 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1344
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.38 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
192.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
96.38 GFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.169 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
192.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
90W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP104
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
GP104-995-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy