Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (784MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (108W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200 +68%
3.553 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K4200
178
Quadro K5200 +64%
293
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
2304
112
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK110B
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy