Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +2826%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1344
Shading Units
32
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.00 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

108W
TDP
40W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G96C
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
G96-875-C1
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy