Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +460%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
192
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK208
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy