Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 108% (1627MHz vs 784MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded +216%
6.664 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K4200
178
RTX A1000 Embedded +628%
1297
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
1192 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1344
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA107S
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy