Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
17920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +7433%
163.4 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
19456
128
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
750W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
146 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net