NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
+674%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1536
Shading Units
112
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
122W
TDP
78W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
