NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
11776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
+1986%
45.26 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
208
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
13312
128
TMUs
832
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
