NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000
+228%
7.119 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
36
1536
Shading Units
2304
128
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
160W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
