Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (122W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC +346%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
256
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

122W
TDP
142W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy