CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (122W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+346%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
VS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
256
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Board Design
122W
TDP
142W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
2
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA GRID M40
3
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
4
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
5
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060
6
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
7
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Tesla M4
8
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
9
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
10
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Tesla K40d
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy