Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC +413%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
128
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

122W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy