Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile +68%
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy