CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
6336 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000M
1.615 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
+755%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000M
VS
Arctic Sound 2T
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
7680
112
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
67.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
1.615 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
67.31 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N14E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Board Design
100W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
2
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
4
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
5
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
7
NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
8
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
9
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
10
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy