Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
5568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000M
1.615 TFLOPS
GRID A100B +760%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
1344
Shading Units
6912
112
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
67.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
1.615 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
67.31 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA100
N14E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy