Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000M +56%
1.615 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1344
Shading Units
448
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
67.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.615 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
67.31 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF100
N14E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy