Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K500M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro K500M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K500M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K500M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +546%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
1344
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK104
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy