NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1005MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
GRID A100A
+486%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
1536
Shading Units
6912
128
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA100
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
