Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M +448%
2.369 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
1536
Shading Units
240
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF104
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy