Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (1404MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q +112%
5.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
1139 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP104
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy