Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1005MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +290%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
2304
Shading Units
6912
192
TMUs
432
48
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
400W
450 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy