NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+414%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
2304
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q5
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
