Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (150W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40c 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (876MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Tesla K40c +42%
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
745 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
2880
192
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
245W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GK180
-
GPU Variant
GK180-890-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy