NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+384%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
51W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
