NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+669%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
2304
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
