NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1124MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (68W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+146%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200
+130%
293
Quadro K2200
127
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1046 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
640
192
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
68W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
