NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1124MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+311%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200
+257%
293
Quadro K620M
82
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
