Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1036MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +67%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200 +280%
293
Quadro M2200 Mobile
77
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
695 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GM206
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy