Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro P4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (1480MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.3GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
Lower TDP (105W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro P4000 +49%
5.304 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
Quadro P4000 +87%
549
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1202 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1901 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
243.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
1792
192
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
94.72 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.88 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.304 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
GP104-850-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy