NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 102% (1560MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
RTX A4000
+439%
19.17 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
RTX A4000
+434%
11079
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
RTX A4000
+470%
5367
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
RTX A4000
+988%
3190
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
2304
Shading Units
6144
192
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
140W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GA104
-
GPU Variant
GA104-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
