NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20m 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Tesla K20m
3.524 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
2496
192
TMUs
208
48
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
