Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 6GB VRAM RTX A3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 102% (1560MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
RTX A3000 Mobile +259%
12.78 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1260 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
32
2304
Shading Units
4096
192
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
199.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.78 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.78 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
199.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy