Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (1404MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q +41%
5.032 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200 +236%
293
Quadro P3200 Max Q
87
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1139 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
1792
192
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy