Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (41W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 +44%
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
256
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.504 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
336.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
14.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF100
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

41W
TDP
142W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy