Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M +318%
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.504 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
336.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
14.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy