Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M +539%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.504 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
336.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
14.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM204
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

41W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy