Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (924MHz vs 902MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +174%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
823 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
924 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2880
Shading Units
1024
240
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GM204
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy