Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (30W vs 900W)
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050 +173%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
448
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.920 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
15.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
376.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
15.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
GF100
N15M-Q2-B-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
900W
-
Suggested PSU
1300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy