Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC +151%
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
122W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy