NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1350MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Max Q
+180%
2.419 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K620
696
Quadro T1000 Max Q
+333%
3019
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K620
240
Quadro T1000 Max Q
+432%
1279
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
765 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.20 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
75.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.838 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.419 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
TU117
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
