Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 60W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1215MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q +440%
4.666 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
600 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
1920
24
TMUs
120
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.76 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.331 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.666 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU106
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy