Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (1612MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +856%
8.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA107S
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
Unknown
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy