Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1358MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile +705%
6.953 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
893 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
95W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA106
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
12 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy