Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 60% (1800MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
10368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
RTX A6000 +4385%
38.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
84
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
10752
24
TMUs
336
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA102
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy