Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 226W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M +124%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Apr 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
128
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
G92
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
G92-880-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
226W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy