Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M +14%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
576
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GK104
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy