Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1480MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +251%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
5GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
160bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
384
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GP106
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy