NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (1569MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+830%
8.033 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K620M
18
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+600%
126
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
1316 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
GP104
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
